Role-Based Containment™

The Defining Governance Infrastructure Layer for the Agentic Era.

Governance for Agentic AI must sit in the infrastructure layer, because only infrastructure can operate at machine speed.

Secours has architected a new class of infrastructure:

Autonomous Systems Governance Infrastructure

Our Role-Based Containment™ (RBC) Protocol evaluates authority at runtime - binding every action to a protected domain and a permitted role before it can take effect.

The result: agentic systems that can act, but only within legally defensible boundaries - unlocking deployment in the world’s most regulated environments.

Agentic AI is moving from tools to autonomous actors - executing transactions, sending communications, touching data, and triggering systems.

But today’s controls govern access, not action.

Once autonomous systems are deployed, organizations cannot reliably constrain what they are allowed to do at the moment of execution, or prove who was responsible when something goes wrong.

That execution-time governance gap is why regulators hesitate, insurers resist, and enterprises stall high-value Agentic AI deployments.

WHAT RBC UNLOCKS ACROSS REGULATED INDUSTRIES

  • Agentic systems can coordinate care, process records, and communicate with patients - while ensuring protected health information is only acted on inside authorized clinical contexts, with provable accountability.

    Without RBC: autonomous workflows remain too risky to deploy broadly, limiting automation in clinical operations and patient engagement.

  • Autonomous trading, payments, and risk systems operate within strict execution-time limits on spend, scope, and counterparties - giving regulators and compliance teams verifiable boundaries.

    Without RBC: firms face unacceptable exposure from runaway trades, regulatory breaches, and uninsurable automated decisioning.

  • Response agents can contain threats at machine speed without creating new exposure - because authority to quarantine systems, move data, or revoke credentials is evaluated at every action

    Without RBC: automated response either stays disabled or creates new legal and operational risk during incidents.

  • Firms can deploy autonomous workflows with defensible chains of delegation, auditable authority, and clear liability attribution - reducing discovery risk and regulatory ambiguity.

    Without RBC: legal departments block deployment or absorb unpredictable exposure when automated systems act.

  • Emergency response systems can coordinate dispatch, communications, and cross-agency data sharing - while ensuring actions occur only within statutory authority, jurisdictional limits, and real-time oversight.

    Without RBC: agencies remain constrained by manual processes or expose themselves to jurisdictional breaches and liability.

  • Autonomous robots in healthcare, logistics, manufacturing, and public spaces can operate within tightly defined safety and liability envelopes - with every physical action constrained, attributed, and auditable.

    Without RBC: physical autonomy is capped by safety concerns, regulatory uncertainty, and insurance refusal.

  • Agencies can automate operations in sensitive environments while maintaining statutory controls, evidence preservation, and rapid human override.

    Without RBC: mission-critical automation remains politically and legally untenable.

Get in touch